<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Wabi-Sabi on Art Imitates Life</title>
    <link>https://artimitates.life/tags/wabi-sabi/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Wabi-Sabi on Art Imitates Life</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://artimitates.life/tags/wabi-sabi/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Before you delete that frame</title>
      <link>https://artimitates.life/blog/before-you-delete-that-frame/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://artimitates.life/blog/before-you-delete-that-frame/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a reflex in photography that runs so deep most people never notice it. A blurry frame: delete. A grain-heavy shot from a push-processed roll: probably delete. The moment you missed by a fraction of a second, the image where the focus landed just behind the subject&amp;rsquo;s eyes: delete, delete, delete.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The reflex is corrective. It assumes the photograph is trying to be something precise and clean, and anything short of that is failure. &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wabi-sabi&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;Wabi-sabi&lt;/a&gt;&#xA; — the Japanese aesthetic sensibility built around imperfection, impermanence, and things as they authentically are — suggests this assumption is worth questioning.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
